like the new Vertu?

And? what do you find about the new Vertu. (except the price offcourse). I think the first one looks better, more slim than the new one, althow we don't have to buy it for the features, just for the looks. But Frank did his best disigning this phone. old one You can see the new one on the start page of mobile review, right colum... 'Vertu Ascent' __________________ The old one looks far better than the new one. __________________ I had a conversation with my driver when we headed to Monte Carlo in my Maybach 62(sold my 57 since I thought the acceleration was rather slow). He thinks its an innovative design but not quite as contrasting as the old one... So I thought to myself, I will call the Prince of Saudi Arabia to hear his opinion. But the dude told me he kept losing his Virtus due to the heavy sunlight in his country, so that wasn't a very useful feedback. I think it looks quite nice actually but the problem is I keep dropping them because they are so slippery. Quite annoying to keep ordering them from the Nokia board of directors. Bah! __________________ I really REALLY don't know why anybody actually buys these phones, even if I was a multi millionaire I wouldn't even look twice at them. They're ugly low-tech pieces of s**t ! The design is boring and who cares what they're made of! I think the type of people who buy these phones have some sort of personality complex where they feel inadequate so buy something which will draw attention away from their inadequecies and people will think "oooh who's that with the spangly phone!!", would much rather spend the money on a nice car or maybe a charity ! __________________ the new one looks like elephant... __________________ the new one reminds me on some piece of furniture __________________ after look at it for a few more seconds...I feel that it is more look like a cockcroach... __________________ old one is much better looking __________________ does the new one has camera?...colour screen?....video reording??....mp3?....MMC card supported?....................bla bla bla..... __________________ DUNGA Is it just me or you who is the supid guy here? Quote: I had a conversation with my driver when we headed to Monte Carlo in my Maybach 62(sold my 57 since I thought the acceleration was rather slow) ??????????? Maybach 62 and 57 have exactly the same engine but the differences here is its length. Maybach 62 is 6.2m long whereas 57 is 5.7m. They both have an V12 engine of 550BHP which make these 2800kg beast fly from 0-100km/h in only 5.1 seconds for Maybach 57 and 5.3 seconds for Maybach 62. So I find your statement very strange. Hmmmmm..... __________________ ????? __________________ DUNGA I hope you explain what you mean with your statement __________________ For god's sake, I cannot believe someone is quoting me on this, what a waste of time. Its a joke dude, its not like I care about its engine. __________________ Quote: Originally posted by McKinley DUNGA Is it just me or you who is the supid guy here? ??????????? Maybach 62 and 57 have exactly the same engine but the differences here is its length. Maybach 62 is 6.2m long whereas 57 is 5.7m. They both have an V12 engine of 550BHP which make these 2800kg beast fly from 0-100km/h in only 5.1 seconds for Maybach 57 and 5.3 seconds for Maybach 62. So I find your statement very strange. Hmmmmm..... i know u found those specs on internet but it's hard to believe that almost 3tons with big specific air resistance and huge wide 19" tyres goes around 5+s from standstill-100km/h especially couz that engine isnt that strong(i dont know how they tuned transmission,but i know they didnt tune it for drag use) but u never know,maybe maybach is perpetuum mobile that doesnt effect laws of physic __________________ Zaratustra Bently Continental GT make it on 4.8 seconds and it weights about the same... and it also have a 550BHP engine. BTW Cadilac Sixteen with a 13.6 litre engine on 1000BHP can do it faster but how fast is not yet sure since the car is still under test. The car weights about the same. __________________ DUNGA You don't care about the engine but still you sold your Maybach 57 because you consider it to slow?? Ok then! __________________ I needed more leg space, are you satisfied? __________________ this is a mobile website....am I right? __________________ Someone drinks too much... __________________ Quote: Originally posted by McKinley Zaratustra Bently Continental GT make it on 4.8 seconds and it weights about the same... and it also have a 550BHP engine. BTW Cadilac Sixteen with a 13.6 litre engine on 1000BHP can do it faster but how fast is not yet sure since the car is still under test. The car weights about the same. bentley weights almost half a tone less and surely it has different transmission tuned Btw vertu is great mobile phone __________________ coming back to the thread......... __________________ The old one looks miles better, the new one just looks cheap, which sort of defeats the purpose. I really like that concierge function. __________________ the new one should at least has a 65000 colour screen plus camera... __________________ They shoulda made a 6600 outta the materials the Vertu is made outta. __________________ then the phone will cost for a few million dolar??? __________________ No,they won't put 6600 in vertu's clothing,cauz a month later it will be outdated,but when they put basic features in it,then it's a classy phone that will last forever __________________ simple is the best?? __________________ yep,minimalistic aproach __________________ but you can rechange the inside of the phone, look at vertu like they are very expecive casings (covers). And with an inside of a Nokia that you can change in future i think... that anyway was the starting point of Vertu