Wednesday, June 6, 2007

nokia 7250

n7250 is good phone
its camera is same as 7250i
how much memoey it haves
i am getting for dhs 550
with charger,manual,headphone
shall i buy it
helppppp......
__________________
dubaiboy

The memory is around 5MB...
How much DHS 550 if converted in USD?
__________________
is this phone going to be your backup phone?
i suggest n7250i is slighty better then n7250... in term of the software...
__________________
u get a grid menu on 720i as well as night mode and upgraded memory
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by dubaiboy
n7250 is good phone
its camera is same as 7250i
how much memoey it haves
i am getting for dhs 550
with charger,manual,headphone
shall i buy it
helppppp......
No don't buy it. I have friends that regrets buying that phone.I don't know why they hate it and they actually stopped me buying it
__________________
150 dollars
what shall i do
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by dubaiboy
150 dollars
what shall i do
what is your other options?
__________________
in dubai 7250 gets in shop
for dhs 800(used)
u say now
__________________
consider about 6230...
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by dubaiboy
in dubai 7250 gets in shop
for dhs 800(used)
u say now
If in dhs 550 you can get a brand new 7250 and you really really like that phone I guess its ok when the 2nd hand is worth dhs 800. I asked my friend why he didn't like it, he told me bacause it does not have a grid menu, xhtml browser, it lacks .5 mb memory (7250 = 3.5 mb; 7250i = 4 mb) in comparrison to 7250i. If you dont need these stuff and like it as it is, and like it better than the other series 40 phones or even phones from other manufacturers then why not .
__________________
ponggie

I do not know where you retrieved the info from regarding the memory capacity (N720 = 3.5MB; N7250i = 4MB), but I know mine very well has around 5MB...
I wasn't mentioned the available memory to be used, but the total memory capacity...
__________________
dubaiboy

USD 150.00 in my opinion is quite cheap if it is a brand new one, but in compare to other brands it becomes losing its value...
The screen quality is awful, CIF cam (not good, but better than T610's cam), tone sounds loud and heavy, the vibration is strong as most NOKIA's phones, texting speed is very good, surfing through wapsites is kinda slow, strong in RF signal...
Well, those are the points I can think of, not a good phone in overall in my opinion, suggest you search for another model...
__________________
People are looking for a low end phone...

6610i is coming...
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by eccentric
ponggie

I do not know where you retrieved the info from regarding the memory capacity (N720 = 3.5MB; N7250i = 4MB), but I know mine very well has around 5MB...
I wasn't mentioned the available memory to be used, but the total memory capacity...
I might be sleepy when i'm typing that but i got it at the nokia site

Maybe this link will work
http://www.nokia.com/phones/comparep...lts.jsp?expcol


Mavi forum

6810 available

the Nokia 6810 is now available, for the price of 330 Euro, an acceptable price for that phone, while the price of the 6820 is 390 Euro...
__________________
I would prefer 6820
__________________
i have 6800 and i love it 6810 is not worth it cuz it only has xhtml added
6820 has a camera and diffrent design which looks a bit uncomfortable
__________________
but 6820 is much smaller and more useful features...


Mavi forum

Who owns a 7200?

alright this time I want to know who actually owns a 7200, and is the hinge(flip) of the phone actually stiff?(as in it doesn't flick open)

and is the screen to small to be comfortable, really?
__________________
the flip is designed by Nokia itself...7200 is the first handphone in the world to use this kind of new flip...

so...only time can prove whether it is bad or good quality...just wait...

screen is small...but is capable to perform much better than u think...
__________________
well the model i saw and felt today had a flip where when you open it a little its sorta stiff but as you go a little further it flicks open, and then as you go to the end it goes flat.

and the screen was relatively actually not bad in terms of size, though obviously a more lengthened screen is better for flipphones

also it looks so much smaller then all these site pics show, but still quite thick and wide

so yeah... anyone who actually OWNS a 7200?
__________________
so far too expensive...very hard to find one who wish to buy this phone...i think everyone is waiting for the price drops...
__________________
It's not a good phone. Not worth getting such a phone for such an expensive price. the design is damn ugly when u open it. i haf played wif the phone. nothing so special, just a normal nokia phone wif flip. i was thinking of getting ot b4 but now not anymore.
__________________
the design is good for someone...I feel that the design is nice as well....very special...
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by cloud
It's not a good phone. Not worth getting such a phone for such an expensive price. the design is damn ugly when u open it. i haf played wif the phone. nothing so special, just a normal nokia phone wif flip. i was thinking of getting ot b4 but now not anymore.

yeah i agree on that... it looks weird when you open it(IMO)
__________________
but I feel it looks great in design...hehe...!!
__________________
i have seen it.... screen is SOOOOO SMALL it makes it ugly
__________________
small but perform well...who cares??
__________________
I had the opportunity to use not one but 2. The hinge is actually very good, if it works. The phone flicks open quite easily. I was surprised as just how natural and good that felt. The problem is having the flexibility to be able to bend the phone fully vertical is actually a pain since it is a bit too loose I found. Add to that fact that on both the phones I used the hinges broke and became loose and the costs if you had to pay to get them fixed was significant, over US$100. I'd definitely suggest anybody interested in a Nokia flip keep waiting.
__________________
For somebody who has waited 5 years for a Nokia flip - Im happy VERY happy. The three main faults are no Bluetooth, slightly small screen (but emminently usable) and the fact its a love hate thing for the design. But the truth is as said before its a normal Nokia (with Vid etc) but in flip mode. And looking at the rate of response to the Gamdeck and looking at the CDMA 6255 then the next 7200 is going to be amazing!
__________________
This is the first flip phone from Nokia for Europe, but i think they are developping a lot more. They know the costumers want them. Most time if they launche something new, they want something special like the 7200 in this case.
__________________
more flip phone will be available...
__________________
i got to use the 7200 let me see wat i found

1) the flip is different . it got no springs and stuff . just open naturally and closes naturally (at least thts wat it felt like )

2) screen is realli small . the cam is not tht gr8 . just like the 6230 or 6600 but darker

3) how do u keep the cloth cover clean? mine has gone black from the sides!!! to much pollution here how do we clean it any idea?
__________________
the design is ok.. but i prefer the limited edition one... dont no why... look good on white colour...
__________________
no, its better than 6230 6600 cam, silly =P

yeah white limited edition doesnt get dirty either its leather
__________________
i wonder how much does it cost?
__________________
they said the limited edition will cost around 1000 Euro, that is a lot, I don't know who's going to give so much money for a mobile phone


Mavi forum

Buying Decision 6230

Hi there!

I have been browsing this forum but haven't found the needed information yet.

I have be selected (what an honor) from Clubnokia Austria to test their 6820. As far as I found out, it has the series 40 Nokia operating system just like the 6230, but I have serious troubles getting used to the menu funtions . Using a 6310i as my main phone and a 7650 as second, I figured Nokia summarized many functions under the main menu items (BT, IR, profiles, ...). This should be a matter of a week to get used to, what really makes me go crazy is the speed !
It takes ages to see the curor moving, changing from one menu into the other (well actually if course it takes fractions of a second, but far to long to really work quickly)! So please tell me, is this due to the series 40 operating system (compared to the series 30 OS of the 6310i, also the symbian 6 is lightning fast) or is it the inferior passivmatrix display of the 6820. If the 6230 behaves alike, I rather stick to my good "old" 6310i as high performance business machine and maybe change my 7650 to a 6600 as a toy. Please, if someone could give me a description of his/her perception of the 6230 in this matter.

many thank,
Christoph
__________________
no, the 6820 is just slow. some phones are just slow.

6230 has been said to be really fast though
__________________
The 6310i is (was) a very good phone, but times goes further, if you want a bussiness phone the 6820 is a good phone, slow or not. Most of the time you'll have no problem with the delay's.
the 6230 off course is just a little better, more functions, more speed...
__________________
ya right...6820 is running under old CPU....

6230 CPU will be much more faster and faster....dun worry...
__________________
I have been running with my 6230 for a week now, and have had no problem with time-lag in menu changes or other menu functions. It is not any slower than any of my previous Nokias (7210, 6310i, 8890, etc, etc.).
__________________
once again...no need to worry about the speed
__________________
Ok, many thanks, that helps a lot!


Mavi forum

Who owns a nokia communicator?

Just curious, who does?
__________________
I don't, but my uncle, my boss and a friend of me do have one...
__________________
what is the point to ask who owns a communicator???
__________________
i m just curious cuz they cost nearly 2k, you can get a high performance notebook with that nowadays, so yeah, pure curiosity who'd actually spend money to buy communicator

though its much smaller then a notebook and really convenient
__________________
for those who has too much $$$....who cares it is as expensive as a notebook??...
__________________
I knew a loser who did once, he dropped it over the side of a boat and didn't have phone insurance. HA!
__________________
ooof! poor guy!!

ESPECIALLY DO NOT BUY a communicator without a phone insurance!!!!
__________________
what do u mean by phone inssurance??..isit warranty??
__________________
Um, not if you drop it over the side of a boat and lose it...how is that a manufacturer's/hardware problem?

It's like if you drove your car into the sea...would the manufacturer replace that under "warranty"??? I doubt it.
__________________
insurance is different with warranty... if someone steals it you can't replace it with warranty
__________________
I have a communicator as my primary phone.
It is the best mobile device I have ever used.
That includes PDAs.
__________________
mainframe...here is gaurav311 has a communicator...time for u to ask questions...
__________________
the point of my question is too find how much of the general crowd actually went to buy a communicator, no specific questions
__________________
I have never purchase any goods with such a lot of cash...!!!
__________________
hey i got a communicator but thinkin of changin it now coz new tech is the thing, its cool and all, full of features but bulky is communicators middle name so gota change ......... gota pic of communicator .......... check it out
__________________
is that the new communicator 9500??...I dun think so
__________________
check out the filename
its a nokia 9210
aint that a communicator
__________________
9210 is the communicator loh...


Mavi forum

Nokia 7600!

Can some one give me more info about Nokia Nokia 7600 model ! and market prices form Singapore,Malaysia,US more if u can . Thanks many !





good luck !
__________________
this is my review of 7600 : http://mobile-review.com/forum2/show...highlight=7600

hope it helps.


Mavi forum

6230 camera vs 6600 camera

from the comparison...6230 VGA camera wins...
__________________
where is the file of the 6600 to compare with?
__________________
I really don't get why most of people believe that 6230 camera is good or even better than 6600...

Maybe compares to other Series40 phones only...
__________________
because it has been proved! alright heres some maths

6230 camera = 7200 camera = 7600 camera

goto threegmobile.net

check out the pics taken with 7200 and the comparison they made with 6600

since 7200 > 6600, 6230 > 6600 because they have the same camera!

voila!
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by Mainframe AI
because it has been proved! alright heres some maths

6230 camera = 7200 camera = 7600 camera

goto threegmobile.net

check out the pics taken with 7200 and the comparison they made with 6600

since 7200 > 6600, 6230 > 6600 because they have the same camera!

voila!
What a STUPID logic. You are comparing picture here not absolute value. Your equal such as 6230 = 7200 is subjective and that makes your deduction 6230 > 6600 a joke.

The only way to compare is to put 2 pictures taken (using same parameters) with the 2 phones side by side.
__________________
I think the image is too pale, wasn't too good in my opinion...
I have seen images taken by N7600, looks to me it has a better quality in sharpness and color saturation...
__________________
after all... VGA quailty pic will still be a VGA quailty pic...
__________________
well sorry mib but that's what i saw on some french review site!!!

Quote:
Originally posted by eccentric
I think the image is too pale, wasn't too good in my opinion...
I have seen images taken by N7600, looks to me it has a better quality in sharpness and color saturation...

reminding you its probably a pale day
__________________
i stand corrected. i think i'm delusional

i found the french site its www.planete-nokia.com

and it compares and 6600 beats 6230

but from threeg its still rather obvious to me 7200 > 6600

and i am not familiar with the 7600 so...

7200 > 6600 > 6230
__________________
ahh i now know where i got the equations from, planete-nokia.com

translated,
"The quality of the photos is excellente: once on the PERCENT, the quality is as good as on the Nokia 6650, 7600 and 7200 and good so, otherwise better than the Nokia 3650/7650/6600 (and therefore better than the one of the Sony Ericsson P800/P900)."

on the nokia 6230 test, but i guess they changed their mind

after looking at many 6230 pics i can now see they are all pale-ish
__________________
woh...picture of KL eh....ehhe..long time no see...

eh tulang man...how much 6230 in malaysia?

haha..i keep asking about price...actually i'm compare it with uk price (on ebay esp). I want to buy a phone, but still looking the best option.

any1 from uk want to sell their phone...contact me. barred hanset through out uk network are most welcome due to less market price
__________________
aiya sasuke....I still can't find shops that are selling this phone lah...i think not yet come to Malaysia...but from the tranlation of USD of 6230...it will be RM2000...WAH!!!

I was trying to upload the photo taken by 6600 at the similar angle but it is too big in file size...can't upload...

I compare boths photo...photo taken by 6230 wins in clearity...and the photo taken by 6600 is much much blurer than 6230...but 6600 wins in photo colour sharpness...

for me...I prefer a much clearer photo...
__________________
how many megapixels are these cameras (6600, 6230)? I thought the cameras on these two phones were exactly the same....?????

Anyways, I have found the 6600 camera to be very disappointing. The Samsung e700 is much better in normal conditions. The nokia does win in nite mode though, although i get a lot of coloured dots on the screen....is that just me or does everyone get that??

Anyways, to say which camera is better is not right....it really depends on the person and how well they can use the camera. Most of the pics I have taken have been bad due to the conditions...poor lighting...but I have taken some that are excellent....some that look like they have been taken from a proper digi cam and resized smaller.
__________________
auswill

Both N6600 & N6230 are VGA cam quality, only 300K resolution, hasn't reached to MP...

The champ of cam phone is still SHARP, no competition yet for this area... Screen quality is also the best, equal to its brand "SHARP"...
__________________
but this thread is talking about VGA camera...dun go too far...

ya right...thay are just a VGA camera...but quality is different between each phones...hope someone out there can post some photo side by side to compare the camera quality between 6600 and 6230...

I admit that...6600 camera is dissapointing...
__________________
there is!!! i told you, planete nokia

6230 first, 6600 second:

http://www.planete-nokia.com/tests/test6600vs6230.php

perfect if you want to compare the 2 phones and decide



against



proves 6230 is paler

but



against



proves 6230 may be sharper...


my perceptions though
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by Mainframe AI

6230 first, 6600 second:
These pics only prove that 6600 has better white balance (better SW) - you get more details

The other one has contrast setting higher which subjectively looks like slightly sharper image, but actual useful information is less there
__________________
from the pics..it proves that 6230 camera is much better than the 6600 one....what a fool on the Nokia top model 6600...
__________________
well

the 6600 camera is more brighter and whiter
6230 is darker
7600 well this phones camera stands out! its realli nice and u will at once see the difference

7200 -- sorry havnt tested it

(all results i have seen are on 640x480)
__________________
6600 has the brighter colour while 6230 has the richer colour...
__________________
has anyone actually been to threegmobile when i said all that? probably not ... ohwell... i'll be the hardworking one again

yes the 7200 IS better



__________________
and please, i don't want anyone saying 6600 is actually better but its resolutions too high. because if you're not lazy, and you actually stretch the 7200 photo pic to the 6600 size, its still brighter and richer.

and no, its not the screen, cuz many review sites have said 6600 screen is much better than the 7200

but i dono the comparison between 7200 and 7600... so far 7200 has had a superb camera.
__________________
among the screen...of course 6600 is the best...

we are comparing the photo taken...not the screen...
__________________
hhmm, do you know what really would be nice?

comparison-photos between ALL nokia VGA-cams!!!


is there anybody who has a 7650, 3650, 6600, 7600, 6230 and 7200 and can make a picture the same motive with all of them???

that would be really interesting and helpful
__________________
well the 6230 camera is not all tht good as u guys may think it is .

i have been using it and i must say , the camera bcomes really bad at dark places. i can see alot of dots and noice on the camera when its dark unlike the 6600
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by enerlevel
...i can see alot of dots and noice on the camera when its dark unlike the 6600
That's what I was talking about...
Gamma correction (artificial "light") and oversaturation artefacts... but it makes pictures look "better"... who cares about distorted colors if they are bright.

Side note: You can make picture taken with 6600 look like 6230 by editing those in Photoshop or similar, but you need a miracle to do the opposite
__________________
i don't know why people like to compare 6230 with 6600,which are used the VGA camera with CMOS and i think their quality of taken pic are similar and satisfied.

if you want a much better camera phone, then go for Sharp GX22 or GX32.
__________________
Slam dunk...both 6600 and 6230 doesn't use CMOS camera....only 7600 is using the CMOS camera...
__________________
Tu!@ng Man .... really? do they use CCD camera??
__________________
so far I only knew that CCD camera is available on some Samsung phones...I dunno what kind of camera is inside the Nokia except for 7600 CMOS...maybe...unknown device by the some Aliens from far away galaxy out there...
__________________
so, i think all Nokia 's camera phones use the CMOS except the 7610.

in my mind,there are Sagem ,Samsung and SHARP using the CCD camera .
__________________
only 7600 is using CMOS...


Mavi forum

7200: take it apart!













http://mobile.163.com/art/pc/040409/040409_13064(1).html
__________________
the sites shows that the flip for 7200 is a new design by Nokia...7200 is the first phone which use this kind of flip...

but I know nothing about the flip....the sites also say not sure about this kind of flip is good or not...time will proves that...
__________________
well for some reson i feel the 7xxx series phone alwaz have somthing left wanting in them . plus their prices are realli high and fall quiet quickly!.

have a look at 7250 -- xpensive when came out
7210 -- xpensive
7600 -- expensive
7200 -- expensive

plus notice , all these phones have really fallen on their price tag specially the 7250i and the 7600 so i feel its useless to buy 7200 i am sure it will fall !. plus it only has 4m.b of memory
__________________
true
its main reason nokia doesnt announce newer models just yet. the new ones will basically make 7250i, and even newer 7200 and 6230 look worthless and too big.
__________________
the link and pics are dead...

i went to a store nearby and they have the 7200 model, the flip hinge is NOT stiff but its just a model so i dont know
__________________
not only the price of 7 series phones falls very fast...all the Nokia phones do...
__________________
lol in tht way , the prices of all phones fall . b it siemens , nokia , samsung etc. but wat i feel is tht the 7xxx series fall quicker casue they have some kinda major feature missed out in them .
__________________
I did check the N7200 price on phone shop, and come to my surprise it is more expensive than N6600 (around USD 50.00)...
Just can't believe what I have found, how the hell the price can be stated as that?
Is it because of some special material used on N7200 just as N89XX series? Anyone can confirm...
__________________
7200 is really cost USD500...I saw it...and confirm it...

I think Nokia set the 7200 price so high because of it is the first flip phone by Nokia...nothing else...Nokia thought everyone will be interested in the first flip phone but WRONG!!!
__________________
i think casue of it being a 7xxx phone . even the 7600 was realli xpensive when it came out but fell realli quickly now its time for the new 7200 .

all fashion phones are xpensive . take sl55 for xample nothing in there but was xpensive for it was a fashion phone .
__________________
but the fashion Samsung phones price drops very slow...


Mavi forum

Whats all the excitement with the 6230?

The design is nice, nothing too great. Small screen. Series 40 menus. Only thing it has going for it is an MP3 player. Other than that, SE T610, T630 and the upcoming K700 all win by a mile - far better design, far superior screen, much better menu design.
__________________
good camera, fm stereo player, EDGE download speeds, streaming audio and video, classic design size, luxurious design colours, etc.

"Only thing it has going for it is an MP3 player"

sorry, but i think you should leave out the "only", mp3 player is mad
__________________
comon now dont compare t610 or 630 with the 6230!!

u have radio, voice recording , 640x480 camera ,4 mins vedio recording , mmc slot , egde ,

now from which feature does the t610 win from a mile? and the k700 might b4 good or better but its an "upcoming model" while 6230 is allready out so thts where the difference is
__________________
k700 doesnt have mmc
__________________
each model has it own advantages and disadvantages....
but i always read about one phone's advantages over another phone's disadvantages...
__________________
ya right...each phone has its own pros and cons...

Dudeman...

no matter how good is other brands phones that u mentioned....6230 is still a very great phone and have a great selling....many people are crazy of it...
__________________
and thus the "dude"man is silent
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by Mainframe AI
and thus the "dude"man is silent
The dudeman is not silent, just offline .

Anyway, all your comments seem fair enough. Point taken.
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by Dudeman
Only thing it has going for it is an MP3 player. Other than that, SE T610, T630 and the upcoming K700 all win by a mile - far better design, far superior screen, much better menu design.
That's how desperate SE fans are, they go to other forums and try to convince themselves how they like SE phones
__________________
se very poor rf - nokia very good rf
a phones gotta be a phone first, whats next is only an advantage
__________________
calm it, he said point taken
__________________
It's just the best nokia phone in that serie... nothing more, nothing less
__________________
SE very poor rf?.. I don't "HEAR" the difference when I'm using the phone... I can call where Nokia can call, and I can't call where Nokia can't call... Only diff is when my bar is 1, nokia has 2-3, but i can still make a very clear call and conversation.

Using T610 by the way =P.. hehe...
__________________
So far Nokia is famous of its better reception...

however...just like the case dxreaper mentioned...when SE got 1 bar and Nokia got 2-3 bars...both phones can call...no problem for which phone has more bars...

but...in the places where SE has no bar and Nokia has 1 bar...both phones can't call too...signal too weak...no point for calling...

so...dun worry about howmany bars are there...
__________________
man his comment isn't even worth arguing over
__________________
The 6230 won't just sell well because of its features, it's a Nokia, and if most people had the choice between a Nokia and another phone brand, they'd choose the Nokia because of the name that Nokia have made for themselves. Although, with the phones they've released recently, I'm starting to wonder how.

I'm not trying to spark another SE - Nokia debate. There are many threads on here already comparing the K700 and 6230.
__________________
so far I prefer 6230....it has a memory slot...
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by Memzee
The 6230 won't just sell well because of its features, it's a Nokia, and if most people had the choice between a Nokia and another phone brand, they'd choose the Nokia because of the name that Nokia have made for themselves. Although, with the phones they've released recently, I'm starting to wonder how.
yeah I'm kinda like that , I know there are lots of competetive handsets out there and even better but i still prefer nokia even I know nokia is the king to holding back features or something lacks in thier handsets. SE, Samsung and others make good phones but I actually had a nightmare that I bought an SE phone in my dream that I didn't even know what kind of SE handset I bought, when i woke up I felt really relieved. this behavior have to go away
__________________
If you look at Nokia 6220, there were hardly any problems, wether hardware nor software. I went for the 6230 as soon as it became available here (even knowing there was a risc it could backfire on me since nokia has been releasing phones with a lot of bugs in the past 12 months) but since 6220 barely had any problems, I just went for it, and I can gladly tell you guys that we haven't had a single complaint so far.

Yes, Nokia has told us that there will be a software / firmware upgrade available as of thursday 15th, but that is only for a small portion of the 6230's that are effected by the MMS / WAP bug. I myself and my other co worker have not experienced any problems of any kind so far, and I think it will remain that way cuz Nokia seems to be back on track, testing their phones properly before shipping them.
__________________
should wait longer for a much stable software and price drops a bit...then is the time to buy...
__________________
where SE has no bars... cant call....
where nokia has 1 bar.. calls perfectly clear... my nokias always work perfect with 1 bar... se rf is horrible..
__________________
not necessarily horrible, just not as good when compared with nokia

nokia's reception so far has been very high quality though I've heard some complaints about 7600, and some other complaints in where the warranty sticker is on top of the antenna.

SE is okayish, but not necessarily horrible
__________________
just walk to somewhere that has better reception to make a call...solved...!!
__________________
what if you have a huge gastrointestinal problem, have to goto the toilet, but have a gash on your head and need to call the hospital and can't move because if you do your guts will explode?
__________________
the use public phones...


Mavi forum