I found this in www.threegmobile.net It shows that 7200 65k TFT(128x128) is much more brighter and provides much colourful that the 6600 screen(176x208)... Is this real?....does this apply to the 6230 screen too??? __________________ i didnt know that the 7200 had ZOOM nokia doesnt say that this phone has zooming capabilities but from the picture it looks like it does __________________ Sometimes it's not the resolution that matters,but it's the color quality and LCD quality that matters alot. Also the SGH-E700's LCD although 65K in 128X160 res,can outbeat most other HI-END models in photo display capabilities. Another is the Inno90,it's LCD is 262K TFT colors in 128X160 res,but can produce clearer and more vibrant images to the E700,yet both are with the same resolutions! It's the design quality that matters alot ![]() __________________ ya right...but... 6600 and 7200 has 65k TFT screen too...somehow 7200 resolution is much less than 6600...but the photo display is so much in different in brightness and clearity... another point is the photo quality...I will post the different later...and u will find the big different... __________________ photo taken by 7200...compare the photo talen by 6600 in the next post... __________________ This is the photo taken by 6600...much blurer than the one taken by 7200... may I know how to paste the photos in the reply post message...so that no need to attach files...and u can straight away see the photo in the post by no need to open it in new windows?? __________________ i feel that the 6600 picture is much better anyways, did you buy the phone ?? how is the phone ?? did you like it ?? it is worth buy ?? __________________ I didn't own the phone...not yet release in Malaysia...haha... I took those photos from www.threegmobile.net __________________ the photos are good i checked out the site pretty good one so i guess i am just gonna buy this phone just waiting for the 6230 so that i can buy both together __________________ what's the point to own so much phone at the same time??... :P __________________ Ah Tu!@ng Man, If your photos are going to be uploaded and displayed in your PC,than your phone's software has to be good for picture quality. __________________ ya I know...but what's the point u mention this??...of course I am searching for a good camera phone...that is why I go for 6600 currently...that is why i post this thread and compare the photo quality taken by different phones.... ![]() __________________ Okay,Okay,I know that,but you try to show me those pictures that has been uploaded into the PC to be displayed here,so that has got nothing to do with LCD screens on the 6600 and 7200! It has got to do with your phone's software! So I'm telling basically you this above ![]() ![]() __________________ ohh...like that lah...but...screen is one point that I taking it seriously...just curious about 7200 screen is so much brighter and colourful than 6600 one... another point is the camera lens...that 2 photos I post show the difference between 6600 and 7200 VGA camera... since photo taken by 7200 is much better...I think lah...so mah let you all know this point loh... of course I always hope the 6600 is the best lah...I own one mah...hahaha __________________ O,I seeeee, And if you take LCD displays seriously,make sure it's TFT type with 65K colors and above,and the res 128X128 and above,anything below this standard is not consider superior! But the best thing it to view the displays live,not in the internets,because it's going to be deceiving especially you won't know what type of Digital cam is used for taking those photos ![]() __________________ Not all the 65k TFT has the same quality....of course I wish to have a best one... as u can see from the photo I posted...7200 65k TFT with 128x128 is much more better than 6600 65k TFT 176x208.... But...I think the 6600 screen in that photo is not set to the correct brightness...since my 6600 screen looks much much sharp and briliant compare the one in the photo.... any idea?? __________________ Could be also,unless the 128X128 res 65K TFT LCD in the 7200 is the improved or advance type that is being develope by Korea. Anyway,you can't actually compare your real 6600 with the photo of LCD displays in your PC,because the lighting could be different,the exposure could be long or shot,and the data convertion could overall easily affect the photos! Maybe the Nokia 7200 has a brighter backlight,because that also make dramatic differences ![]() ![]() __________________ I don't think so. __________________ Why you don't think so,what have you got to add? __________________ What I mean is I don't think the backlight has anything to do with how sharp and clear the image is. __________________ tulang man, i'll go for teh second picture (6600 was it?)... why?.. while the 7200 looks sharper.. that can be solved from the 6600's picture... but if you noticed in the 7200's picture, the colour is off and all... and TOO sharp.. like digitally enhanced to make it 'look' better only... __________________ ![]() Left is the original 7200 picture while right is the edited 6600 picture. The colour and sharpness is just about digitally enhancing it only.. nothing to do with the optics.. __________________ u mean u prefer a blurer pic but not a sharper pic?? ![]() __________________ would you want a very sharp and 'fake' looking picture?.. or a nice and smoothed out picture?... You know what i mean... When it's too digitally enchanced... it'll look fake and ugly... i'm just trying to say that the 6600's image can look like the 7200's picture which shows that they're using the same optics but with different digital system... __________________ the right picture is much better... colors are not mixed and black looks more black... __________________ The right is a 6600's picture which was digitally enchanced by me =).. __________________ It looks better than the other one. __________________ what do u mean by....digitally enhanced by u?...I copy the photo from a website...it is created by u?? __________________ no it isn't... i took THAT picture you copied from a website and 'enchance' it further.. compare my picture (the right one) with your 6600's picture... the left one is the original 7200 picture while the right one is the enhanced 6600 picture __________________ confused...haha...yup...yours look much better...how do u "enhanced" it?? anyway...I just wish to know how u paste your pics straight away on to the post...so I no need to browse and attach files...and u all no need to open the pics in new windows...straight away can see from the post like what u did... __________________ the picture must be on a web site and you'll type (without the spaces) [ I M G ]http://blah blah blah[ / I M G ] so it'll be something like {IMG}http://google.com/1.jpg{/IMG} I used Corel PhotoPaint to just sharpen the image, change colour intensity, contras and remove noise and all those... __________________ can u try to sharpen this photo and let me compare the different?? __________________ ![]() Left one is the original, right is edited. __________________ Thanks man...wow...the one edited by u is really look much sharper than the originally taken by my 6600... Where to get the software u use to enhanced it?? __________________ Just go to any computer shops around and you can pick it up.. I use Corel PhotoPaint which is a pograms in Corel Draw or something... more people are using Adobe Photoshop... similar... What i did was just sharpen the image, and i slowly removed some of the 'noise' manually... took some time.. __________________ at least enhancing can make the further items in the photo look clearer... Mavi forum |
Thursday, May 31, 2007
6600 screen vs 7200 screen
Posted by
Admin
at
4:12 AM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment